← The Fractional Playbook

Benten Woodring Built His Second Studio Around His First Mistakes

Benten Woodring Built His Second Studio Around His First Mistakes

Hey, I’m Gev Marotz, a fractional product and design partner. I’m interested in how people build independent businesses that leave room for life. Benten Woodring’s story is about what it takes to get there.


Benten Woodring took his laptop on a two-and-a-half-week road trip with his family. He assumed he’d need it. By the time the trip ended, he hadn’t opened it once.

The design studio he founded, NOOON, had continued without him. There weren’t any emergencies that required his attention or decisions only he could make. Woodring had spent years trying to reach that point. When it arrived, the clearest evidence was a computer left unused.

NOOON is a brand and web studio serving technology companies in logistics, manufacturing, infrastructure, energy and other physical industries. Woodring started it in early 2024 and spent its first year building the company alongside a full-time job. He says it can now operate without his daily involvement, though it still depends on him to grow.

The studio’s progress can look fast when measured from its launch. The more useful timeline begins much earlier. Woodring had already run businesses, lost money, freelanced for more than a decade and tried to build a studio by working 80-hour weeks. NOOON felt natural, he says, because he’d exhausted so many of the ways it could go wrong.

“I actually think I got a lot right just because I’ve made so many mistakes,” he said.


Woodring didn’t plan to become a designer. He studied business and grew up in a blue-collar family. His father ran an HVAC business. His grandfather ran a metal shop. After college, Woodring took an internship at a youth nonprofit in Denver, where he earned $800 a month.

The nonprofit had a screen-printing shop in its basement. Someone had donated the equipment, and the organization wanted to use it to teach young people job skills. Woodring didn’t know how to run the equipment. The nonprofit initially declined to hire him, he said, then agreed on the condition that he raise the money for his own salary.

He learned the press because the job required it. He prepared screens, printed shirts and taught the young people working in the shop. Then customers began asking if he could design the artwork too.

“I guess,” he’d tell them.

His formal preparation amounted to a Photoshop class in high school. He began making what he now describes as terrible logos. When one customer asked what he charged, Woodring picked a number: $100. The customer paid it.

“Oh my gosh, I just made money doing that,” Woodring remembers thinking.

The exchange gave him his first paid design client. It also established a pattern. Much of his career would advance through the next problem someone placed in front of him.

By then, he already knew that running a business could be expensive. At 19, Woodring managed a residential painting franchise with as many as eight employees. He hired too freely and lacked the training to prepare his crew properly. Mistakes followed.

On one job, Woodring said, the team had to redo the work entirely because of an error he’d made. A project he expected to produce roughly $6,000 in profit instead contributed to a loss. By the end of the summer, he was down about $5,000.

That was a large amount of money for him at 19. Woodring doesn’t present it as a charming origin story. It was the cost of discovering, too late, that sales and competence are different things. Winning work didn’t mean he knew how to deliver it.


Design offered another apprenticeship, though not one he always felt prepared for. When Woodring and his wife were expecting a child, he decided he needed to earn more than the nonprofit could pay. He applied for design jobs and landed an interview at a corporate events agency partly, he says, because he shared an uncommon surname with the creative director.

The coincidence got his résumé noticed. It didn’t close the gap in his skills. Woodring hadn’t used some of the software required for the role, but the agency hired him. He learned while designing signs, screens, name badges and other materials for large corporate events.

Years later, at the design agency Unfold, the feeling returned. Woodring would open a shared Figma file and watch more experienced designers work.

“I don’t know why they hired me,” he remembers thinking. “I have no idea what I’m doing.”

He watched anyway. He studied how they built websites and improved through proximity. At the same time, he kept freelancing, as he had for more than a decade. Those projects expanded his skills and, just as important, his relationships with designers and developers he might later call.

Experience didn’t make him immune to overwork. In an earlier attempt to go out on his own, Woodring said he worked about 80 hours a week for a year while supporting a family of four. He burned out and made little money. The time lost with his family stayed with him.

“If I’m going to do it, I’m going to do it right this time,” he decided before starting NOOON.


For Woodring, doing it right meant resisting the urge to make the studio his full-time occupation before it had earned that status. NOOON officially began in January 2024, but he remained employed at another agency. He devoted 15 to 20 hours a week to the new business, usually in the early mornings and evenings.

The schedule was demanding. He gave up cycling, one of his favourite hobbies, to create the time. But he imposed a limit because he knew what happened without one.

Woodring also began with resources he hadn’t had before. His network could bring in clients and provide trusted collaborators. He hired a designer and a developer he already knew. Instead of building a team from strangers, he assembled one from relationships formed over years of agency work and freelancing.

The company controlled its workload too. No designer or developer would usually handle more than two projects at once, Woodring said. At previous agencies, he’d found himself responsible for as many as 15 clients. NOOON limits were designed to prevent that strain from becoming normal.

He kept his job until the overlap became impractical. In February 2025, according to Woodring, the studio had enough work that he could no longer manage both. Only then did he leave his employer.

There wasn’t a dramatic break with salaried work. Demand made the decision for him.


NOOON initially accepted a wider range of technology clients. It has since focused on companies bringing software and new business models into industries such as freight, manufacturing, engineering, infrastructure and energy. The studio develops brands, messaging and websites for those businesses.

The category also brings Woodring back to the kinds of companies he knew growing up. But NOOON remains a young agency, and its position isn’t secure. At the time of the interview, Woodring said the studio had gone about a month without closing a project, the longest such period since it began.

Leads were still arriving. They weren’t becoming signed work. Woodring was unsure whether the slowdown reflected summer timing, broader caution among buyers or something more lasting. He’d noticed other studios waiting for work, but he didn’t claim to know what would happen next.

The open time has allowed the team to update its website, review its sales process and finish internal work that had been deferred. That’s useful, though it doesn’t remove the underlying question. A studio that can operate without its founder still needs enough clients to operate at all.

Woodring’s own work has become less visible as he’s stepped away from design and creative direction. He describes the shift into the CEO role as an adjustment in identity. A designer can point to what he made that day. A chief executive may spend the same hours on calls, email, staffing and financial decisions.

“When you’re a CEO, it’s like, I don’t know,” he said. “I was on some calls and did some emails and some Slack.”

That less tangible role is part of the structure that let Woodring take the family road trip. He’d tested the company in shorter absences, telling the team to contact him only in an emergency. By the time he left for two and a half weeks, the studio no longer needed a daily rescue.

The original goal was to make more space for life. Now the space exists, and Woodring has begun filling some of it with another question.


Woodring says he’s fully deaf in his right ear. He’s wanted for years to create something useful for deaf and hard-of-hearing people, but he hasn’t decided what it should be. He’s interviewing accessibility leaders, designers, audiologists, investors in accessible technology and people with their own experience of hearing loss.

He doesn’t yet know whether the result will be a company, a smaller independent business or something else. His immediate plan is to publish a report on what he learns. The uncertainty matters. He’s investigating a need rather than fitting a personal experience to a predetermined product.

Woodring has started other projects this way. A recurring inconvenience led him to build a directory for finding available freelancers. A friend’s unused design work helped inspire a sharing project. Some ideas continued. Others didn’t. He’s willing to stop when the reason to keep going disappears.

The thought that starts many of them is simple: “Why don’t we just make it?”

He has more room to ask that question now. What he makes next is still unknown, which may be why he’s taking his time before answering it.


Making room for life is also part of why I’m building Juggle, a tool to help independent consultants keep track of client work. We’re looking for early beta testers. Join us.

Thanks for reading,
Gev